Small cell lung cancer with bone metastasis prognosis

Introduction

Lung cancer has a high morbidity and mortality worldwide1,2,3. Although the survival rate is increasing after neoadjuvant and surgical treatment nowadays, patients with metastatic disease still have a poor prognosis, especially in those with bone metastases4,5,6. Bone is the most frequent site of distant metastases in lung cancer. The presence of bone metastases is a negative prognostic factor for patients with lung cancer. Santini Daniele et al.7 found that patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer with bone metastases represented a heterogeneous population in terms of risk of skeletal events. The median survival time of patients with bone metastases is usually less than 1 year from diagnosis of bone metastasis to death8, 9. Also, the bone diseases are often complicated by skeletal-related events, including radiotherapy, pathological fractures, spinal cord compression and hypercalcemia. Moreover, these skeletal-related events will decrease patients’ quality of life by causing pain, with decline in physical, functional and emotional well being. Moreover, survival improvement in patients suffered from lung cancer has resulted in a further raise in the incidence of bone metastases and in all likelihood a change in the natural history of this condition.

It is clear that early diagnosis and prevention of bone metastases becomes a relevant clinical intervention to increase the survival rate of patients. Although there are different studies showing that bone metastases definitively influence the overall survival in lung cancer, the risk factors dedicated to bone metastases in lung cancer patients remain unclear. And the data about lung cancer available in literature are less of clear explanation and only base on relatively small cohorts of patients. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the risk factors correlated with lung cancer metastasis to bone for preventing and early treating bone metastasis.

In this retrospective study, we evaluated the correlation between several clinical-pathological factors and bone metastases at the time of diagnosis, and determined the risk factors for bone metastases in lung cancer based on a large population investigation.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

The ethical committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University has approved this study. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients included in this study. The methods were carried out according to the approved guidelines.

Study design

A series of consecutive patients who were diagnosed as lung cancer at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University between January 2005 and November 2016 were included in this study. All the diagnoses were confirmed by the histopathologic examination of the samples harvested from biopsy or surgery. The patients included in this study were firstly diagnosed as primary lung cancer, and admitted to the hospital without radiotherapy or surgery. Patients who were identified as secondary lung cancer were excluded from this study.

The bone metastasis was identified based on one of the following criteria: the identification of bone metastasis was made by radionuclide bone scan; bone metastasis was found by other imaging assessment (e.g. standard x-rays, computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance imaging of the skeleton).

All the medical records of these patients were carefully reviewed, and the demographic and characteristic data of patients at the first diagnosis (before patients undergoing any treatment, such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery) were collected. The serum concentrations of biomarkers, such as CA-125, CA-199 and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), were recorded. According to the criteria developed by the Department of Nuclear Medicine of the hospital, 27 U/ml was considered to be the upper normal limit for CA-199 and 35 U/ml for CA-125. For ALP, the concentrations of it were divided into three groups according to Wymenga LF et al.10 classification (<90 U/L, 90–140 U/L and >140 U/L). The correlation between clinical-pathological parameters, biomarkers and bone metastases in these patients with lung cancer at the first diagnosis were analyzed.

Statistical analysis

The continuous data in this study, such as age, concentrations of CA-125 and CA-199 were firstly divided into subgroups, and then transformed into dichotomous data for analysis. All the clinical parameters were evaluated as possible risk factors related to bone metastases by Chi square test. Binary logistic regression analysis was then used to identify the risk factors for bone metastases. The accuracy of diagnosis by the risk factors was calculated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Statistical analysis was conducted by SPSS software (version 19.00; SPSS, Chicago, IL). P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Demographic characteristics

A total of 2021 patients were included in this study. The clinical-pathological parameters of patients are displayed in Table 1. Majority of the included patients were male (72.7%). The most common pathological subtype was adenocarcinoma (43.8%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (34.7%) and small cell lung cancer (12.5%). A total of 483 patients (23.9%) were identified with bone metastases at the time of diagnosis. The ages of patients with and without bone metastases at diagnosis were 59.7 years (range, 28–88 years) and 60.9 years (range, 6 to 96 years), respectively.

Table 1 Characteristics of patients with lung cancer included in this study.

Full size table

In patients with bone metastases, non-small cell lung cancer represented the most common histopathologic subtype (410 cases, 84.9%), which included adenocarcinoma (62.1%), squamous cell carcinoma (21.3%), large cell carcinoma (0.8%) and adenosquamous carcinoma (0.6%) (Table 2).

Table 2 The differences between patients with and without bone metastases.

Full size table

Distribution of bone metastases sites

The distribution and number of metastatic sites in patients with bone metastases are demonstrated in Table 3. The most common site of bone metastases was rib (62.3%), followed by thoracic (53.8%) and lumbar spine (40.4%). The least affected site was ulna and radius (0.8%). Moreover, 41.8% of the patients were affected by one site and 38.5% had more than three metastatic sites. This indicates that lung cancer patients have a high incidence risk to get multiple bone metastases.

Table 3 The distribution and number of metastatic sites in patients with bone metastases.

Full size table

The correlation between clinical factors and the number of metastases sites

Linear regression analysis was used to determine the correlation between different clinical factors and the number of metastases sites in lung cancer patients. The results showed that both of the concentrations of CA-125 and ALP were correlated with the number of bone metastases sites, respectively (R = 0.113, P = 0.012 and R = 0.157, P < 0.001).

Risk factors for bone metastases in patients with lung cancer

In order to identify the risk factors for bone metastases in patients with lung cancer, the clinical factors were compared between patients with and without bone metastases (Table 2). Significant differences were found for patients’ age, histopathologic type and the concentrations of CA-125, CA-199 and ALP between the two groups. Binary logistic regression analysis additionally indicated that histopathologic type (OR = 1.160, P = 0.002), the concentration of CA-125 and ALP (OR = 0.999, P = 0.001 and OR = 0.996, P < 0.001) were the independent risk factors for bone metastases in lung cancer (Table 4).

Table 4 The risk factors of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer.

Full size table

The sensitivities and specificities of risk factors for diagnosing bone metastases

The area under ROC curves (AUC) was analyzed to determine the accuracy of CA-125 and ALP levels on diagnosing bone metastases in patient with lung cancer. The AUC values were 0.588 for CA-125 and 0.610 for ALP, respectively. The sensitivities and specificities for the diagnosis of bone metastases by CA-125 were 32.1% and 80.8%, and by ALP were 41.3% and 77.1%.

Discussion

Distant metastasis is one of the main features of malignant tumor. In consistent with other malignant diseases, lung cancer is also prone to metastasis, and bone is the common site of distant metastasis for it. More and more studies show that lung cancer is the third most frequent form of cancer causing malignant lesions of bone metastases11, 12. It is reported that the prevalence of bone metastasis second from lung cancer at the time of diagnosis is 15–40%11, 13, 14. In the present study, the incidence of bone metastases at initial diagnosis was 23.9% in patients with lung cancer, and adenocarcinoma (62.1%) was found to be the most common histopathologic subtype, which was similar to the results of previous studies11.

For the distribution of bone metastases from lung cancer, few studies reported the exact outcomes of it. Based on a large population analysis in our study, the most frequent site of bone metastases was rib (62.3%), followed by thoracic (53.8%) and lumbar spine (40.4%). These results are consistent with Quint et al.'s study15. The reasons for the high incidence of rib and thoracic spine metastases in lung cancer patients are the existence of venous traffic branches among lung, intercostals and vertebral vein, and the short distance among these organs. Thus, the lung cancer cells can easily spread to ribs and thoracic spine. Moreover, we found the incidence of multiple sites of bone metastases was relative high in patients, which was just second to single site metastasis. And the concentrations of CA-125 and ALP were detected to be associated with the number of bone metastases sites. It means that the higher levels of CA-125 and ALP are, the more possibility of multiple bone metastases may occur.

Several studies have reported the risk factors for bone metastases second from lung cancer. Oliveira et al.11 found that the histological subtype of adenocarcinoma was significantly associated with higher risk of developing bone metastases in patients with lung cancer. Conen et al.16 showed that elevated LDH and age ≥75 years were independent risk factors for bone metastases in small cell lung cancer patients. In accordance with previous studies, we also found histopathologic type was one of the risk factors for bone metastases in lung cancer patients. However, different from previous studies, we additionally identified the concentrations of CA-125 and ALP as the independent risk factors of bone metastases.

The tumor marker CA-l25, which is specific as a marker of malignant disease, has been applied for diagnosis and evaluation recurrence of ovarian cancer more than 30 years. Perioperative serum CA-125 level is a prognostic factor for survival in patients with ovarian cancer17. Studies carried out by Chung et al.18 and Son et al.19 revealed that elevated CA-125 level was associated with advanced stage disease and lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. Han et al.20 and Chao et al.21 proposed different cut-off values for predicting lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial cancer. CA-125 is not only produced by epithelial tumors, but also by mesothelial cells. Thus, the level of CA-125 would be higher in pleural fluid than that in serum22. Choi et al.23 found that pleural CA-125 levels were significantly higher in malignant pleural effusions than those in benign pleural effusions. Bielsa et al.24 indicated that high level of CA-125 in pleural fluid was an independent predictor of poor outcome in squamous malignant effusions. However, few studies investigated the correlation between serum CA-125 level and bone metastases in lung cancer currently. In the present study, we retrospectively evaluated the serum concentration of CA-125 in 2021 lung cancer patients with and without bone metastases. The results showed that the serum CA-125 level was significant higher in patients with bone metastases compared to those without bone metastases. And it was an independent risk factor for bone metastases in lung cancer, with a sensitivity of 32.1% and specificity of 80.8%.

ALP is presented in many human tissues, such as bone, kidney and liver. It partly reflects the activity of osteoblast and can be used as a marker for patients with larger volume or aggressive bony metastatic disease. Studies indicated that the serum ALP level was associated with bone metastasis in prostate cancer, and high level of it was related to a poor clinical outcome25, 26. Alataş et al.27 reported that the level of ALP was significantly higher in lung cancer patients with bone metastases than those without bone metastases, and the sensitivity and specificity of it for diagnosing bone metastases were 89% and 44%. Kang et al.6 found that high level of ALP was an independent poor prognostic factor for small cell lung cancer with bone metastases. In line with Kang et al. study, we also detected that ALP was a risk factor for bone metastases in lung cancer patients. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing bone metastases by it were 41.3% and 77.1%. Thus, our results indicate that serum ALP level may be useful to predict bone metastases in patients with lung cancer.

Although we successfully identified the independent risk factors for bone metastases in lung cancer, there are still some limitations in the present study. First, it was a retrospective study and some clinical parameters were not included in the analysis because of insufficient data, which may affect the outcomes of this study. Second, we just reviewed the data of patients at the time of diagnosis, and some data such as time to develop bone metastases, survival rate of patients and the duration of follow-up were not reported in this study. Third, only patients from a single institution were involved in this study. And a prospective, multi-center study is necessary to verify the results of our study.

In conclusion, based on a large population investigation, the incidence of bone metastases in lung cancer was 23.9%, and the most frequent bone metastases sites were rib and thoracic spine in our study. The most common histopathologic subtype was adenocarcinoma in patients with bone metastases. Histopathologic type and the serum concentrations of CA-125 and ALP were identified as the independent risk factors of bone metastases in lung cancer. However, some limitations are existed in this study and a prospective, multi-center study is necessary to verify the results.

References

1. World Health Organization. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks [M]. World Health Organization (2009).

2. Venuta, F. et al. Lung cancer in elderly patients. J Thorac Dis 11(Suppl), S908–S914 (2016).

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Langer, C. J., Besse, B., Gualberto, A., Brambilla, E. & Soria, J. C. The evolving role of histology in the management of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 28, 5311–20 (2010).

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

4. Windrichova, J. et al. Testing of a Novel Cancer Metastatic Multiplex Panel for the Detection of Bone-metastatic Disease - a Pilot Study. Anticancer Res 36, 1973–8 (2016).

   PubMed  Google Scholar 

5. Tang, C. et al. Prognosis and predictors of site of first metastasis after definitive radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Acta Oncol 55, 1022–8 (2016).

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

6. Kang, E. J. et al. Prognostic Factors and Skeletal-Related Events in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer with Bone Metastases at the Time of Diagnosis. Oncology 90, 103–11 (2016).

   Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

7. Santini, D. et al. Natural History of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Bone Metastases. Sci Rep 5, 18670 (2015).

   Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

8. NCCN Clinical Practice Guideline in Oncology: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. www.nccn.org (2014).

9. Niu, Y. J. et al. Risk factors for bone metastasis in patients with primary lung cancer: study protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open 4, e005202 (2014).

   Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

10. Wymenga, L. F., Boomsma, J. H., Groenier, K., Piers, D. A. & Mensink, H. J. Routine bone scans in patients with prostate cancer related to serum prostate- specific antigen and alkaline phosphatase. BJU Int 88, 226–30 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

11. Oliveira, M. B., Mello, F. C. & Paschoal, M. E. The relationship between lung cancer histology and the clinicopathological characteristics of bone metastases. Lung Cancer 96, 19–24 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

12. Bubendorf, L. et al. Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: an autopsy study of 1,589 patients. Hum Pathol 31, 578–83 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

13. Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 65, 5–29 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

14. Sugiura, H., Yamada, K., Sugiura, T., Hida, T. & Mitsudomi, T. Predictors of survival in patients with bone metastasis of lung cancer. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466, 729–36 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

15. Quint, L. E. et al. Distribution of distant metastases from newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 62, 246–50 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

16. Conen, K., Hagmann, R., Hess, V., Zippelius, A. & Rothschild, S. I. Incidence and predictors of Bone Metastases (BM) and Skeletal-Related Events (SREs) in Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): A Swiss patient cohort. J Cancer 7, 2110–2116 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

17. Zwakman, N. et al. Perioperative changes in serum CA125 levels: a prognostic factor for disease-specific survival in patients with ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 28, e7 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

18. Chung, H. H. et al. Use of preoperative serum CA-125 levels for prediction of lymph node metastasis and prognosis in endometrial cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85, 1501–5 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

19. Son, J. H. et al. Prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with apparent early endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol Sci 58, 385–90 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

20. Han, S. S. et al. Evaluation of preoperative criteria used to predict lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89, 168–74 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

21. Chao, A. et al. Potential of an age-stratified CA125 cut-off value to improve the prognostic classification of patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 129, 500–4 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

22. Ferrer, J. et al. Diagnostic utility of CYFRA 21-1, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA125, neuron-specific-enolase and squamous cell antigen level determinations in the serum and pleural fluid of patients with pleural effusions. Cancer 86, 1488–95 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

23. Choi, W. I., Qama, D., Lee, M. Y. & Kwon, K. Y. Pleural cancer antigen-125 levels in benign and malignant pleural effusions. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 17, 693–7 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

24. Bielsa, S. et al. High levels of tumor markers in pleural fluid correlate with poor survival in patients with adenocarcinomatous or squamous malignant effusions. Eur J Intern Med 20, 383–6 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

25. Matsuyama, H. et al. Combination of hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, and age predicts optimal docetaxel regimen for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 19, 946–54 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

26. Moslehi, M., Cheki, M., Salehi-Marzijarani, M., Amuchastegui, T. & Gholamrezanezhad, A. Predictors of bone metastasis in pre-treatment staging of asymptomatic treatment-naïve patients with prostate cancer. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 32, 286–9 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

27. Alataş, F. et al. Usefulness of bone markers for detection of bone metastases in lung cancer patients. Clin Biochem 35, 293–6 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Department of Science and Technology Program of Jiangxi Province, China (No. 20162BCB22022, 20162BCB23057).

Author information

Author notes

1. Yang Zhou and Qing-Fu Yu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 330006, Nanchang, P.R. China

   Yang Zhou, Qing-Fu Yu, Wei-Lai Tong, Jia-Ming Liu & Zhi-Li Liu

2. School of Humanities, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 330006, Nanchang, P.R. China

   Ai-Fen Peng

3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, People’s Hospital of Nanhai District of Foshan City, 52800, Foshan, P.R. China

   Wei-Lai Tong

Authors

1. Yang Zhou

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

2. Qing-Fu Yu

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

3. Ai-Fen Peng

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

4. Wei-Lai Tong

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

5. Jia-Ming Liu

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

6. Zhi-Li Liu

   You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.-L.L. and J.-M.L. designed the study, Q.-F.Y. and W.-L.T. carried out the experiment, Y.Z. interpretation of the data, A.-F.P. edited the language of the manuscript and Y.Z. and Q.-F.Y. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jia-Ming Liu or Zhi-Li Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Yu, QF., Peng, AF. et al. The risk factors of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer. Sci Rep 7, 8970 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09650-y

Download citation

• Received: 06 January 2017

• Accepted: 28 July 2017

• Published: 21 August 2017

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09650-y

What is the life expectancy of someone with bone metastases?

What is the treatment for lung cancer that has spread to the bones?

What stage is lung cancer that has spread to the bones?

How long can you live with Stage 4 lung and bone cancer?